The North Sea in peril: Can one of the world’s most productive seas survive human pressure?
From towering wind turbines to deep-sea trawlers, the North Sea is a beehive of human activity. But beneath the waves of one of the world’s most explored and exploited seas lies a fragile and increasingly stressed ecosystem. Spanning the coasts of Scotland, the Netherlands and Germany, the North Sea has long been both a lifeline and a living laboratory, powering economies, connecting nations and exposing the true cost of human impact on the ocean. Now, after centuries of development, relentless fishing and increasing climate stress, a critical question looms: can the North Sea hold out?
Human intervention in the North Sea is nothing new. Dikes and land reclamation began reshaping its coastal wetlands a thousand years ago. The Industrial Revolution added pollution and river modification to the mix. And after the Second World War, an explosion of fishing, industrial waste dumping and coastal urbanisation marked the start of what scientists now call the ‘Anthropocene’ era of marine history.
Today, the North Sea is the stage for some of the most intensive maritime activities in the world: commercial fishing, shipping, aquaculture, offshore oil and gas drilling and, more recently, massive offshore wind developments. These overlapping uses put immense pressure on marine ecosystems.
Overfishing, invasive species and plastic: A toxic mix
Perhaps no pressure has been as visible or historically devastating as overfishing. The collapse of key stocks – such as cod and herring – has reshaped the marine food web. Large predators have become rare, while species lower down the food chain have proliferated. This disruption has cascading effects: declining populations of filter-feeding species degrade water quality, and benthic habitats are damaged by bottom trawling.
Meanwhile, global shipping routes have brought unintended passengers. Invasive species, transported in ballast water or released through aquaculture and aquariums, are colonising new territories. These intruders can destabilise ecosystems by outcompeting native species, altering food webs and disrupting key functions such as nutrient cycling. The resulting loss of ecosystem services has direct consequences – not only for biodiversity, but also for human livelihoods.
Pollution also remains a major concern.
Fertiliser run-off and sewage discharge into rivers feed nutrient overloads in the sea, causing harmful algal blooms, oxygen-depleted dead zones and toxic outbreaks that can devastate fish and shellfish populations. Plastic debris from aquaculture, rivers and shipping accumulates on the seabed and along coastlines and is often ingested by marine animals, with fatal consequences. Recent studies suggest that microplastic concentrations may be higher near offshore wind farms, likely due to paint and coating erosion from turbine infrastructure.
Rising temperatures
As if these pressures weren’t enough, climate change is adding to the crisis. The North Sea is warming faster than the global ocean average. This warming is driving species migration: Atlantic cod are retreating northwards in search of cooler waters, while southern species are expanding their range out to sea. Ocean acidification, caused by the absorption of CO₂, is also threatening marine organisms that rely on calcium carbonate for their shells and skeletons. The potential collapse of these species could ripple through entire food chains.
And there’s a newer, less visible threat: noise pollution.
As commercial shipping has tripled in recent decades, underwater noise has increased dramatically. Marine mammals and fish that rely on sound to forage, communicate and reproduce are increasingly disturbed. Studies show that even low-frequency boat noise can cause changes in behaviour and stress responses in species such as seals, gobies and seahorses. Pile-driving and seismic surveys associated with offshore energy development add to the acoustic assault.
But if the pandemic has taught us anything, it’s that recovery is possible.During the COVID-19 closures, reductions in maritime activity led to measurable reductions in underwater noise, providing a rare glimpse into the ocean’s potential for resilience – if given the chance.
Knowledge gaps
Despite decades of marine research in the North Sea, important gaps remain. Most scientific studies still focus on isolated pressures or individual species. Few take an integrated approach, looking at how cumulative impacts unfold over space and time. Models often lack the resolution needed to distinguish between natural variability and human-induced change.
Meanwhile, some issues, like underwater noise, receive surprisingly little attention in long-term monitoring programmes. Others, such as the socio-economic impacts of biodiversity loss, remain under-researched despite their importance for policy and public awareness.
If we are to manage the North Sea sustainably, scientists argue, we need transdisciplinary collaboration, better long-term data and tools that can capture the complexity of a changing sea.
Turning the tide
The good news is that some solutions are already known – and tested. Marine protected areas (MPAs) can play a crucial role. Well-managed MPAs have been shown to dramatically increase fish biomass and biodiversity. In fully protected areas, fish stocks are more than six times higher than in nearby unprotected waters. Yet many MPAs in the North Sea remain ‘paper parks’, with weak enforcement and limited coverage.
To be effective, MPAs need strong management plans, funding, monitoring and enforcement. They also need ecologically sound boundaries – large enough to support species recovery and strategically placed to protect key habitats. Migratory species, which can easily move outside MPA boundaries, require broader regional coordination.
Valuing ecosystem services can also change the equation.
Policymakers tend to focus on sectors that are easy to monetise, such as fisheries or tourism. But placing a value on carbon sequestration, nutrient cycling or coastal protection could better reflect the true value of a healthy North Sea. It could also help governments prioritise investment in conservation and sustainable development.
A shared sea, a shared responsibility
The North Sea does not belong to any one country. Its fate depends on cooperation – between scientists and politicians, between industry and regulators, and across national boundaries. It is a sea of enormous economic, environmental and cultural importance. But it is also a sea under pressure.
As new uses – such as large-scale offshore wind farms – compete with older ones, and as climate change accelerates ecological disruption, we need to ask not just how much more the North Sea can take, but how we can begin to restore what’s already been lost. Resilience is still possible. But it won’t come from passive protection. It will require active, science-based governance, better tools and a shift in how we value marine ecosystems – not just for their economic returns, but for the life they support.
References
Andersen, J.H., Al-Hamdani, Z., Harvey, T., Kallenbach, E., Murray, C. and Stock, A. (2020) ‘Relative impacts of multiple human stressors in estuaries and coastal waters in the North Sea–Baltic Sea transition zone’, Science of The Total Environment, 704. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135316
Börger, T., Beaumont, N. J., Pendleton, L., Boyle, K. J., Cooper, P., Fletcher, S., Haab, T., Hanemann, M., Hooper, T.L., Hussain, S.S., Portela, R., Stithou, M., Stockill, J., Taylor, T. and Austen, M. C. (2014) ‘Incorporating ecosystem services in marine planning: the role of valuation’, Marine Policy, 46, pp. 161-170. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.01.019
Borgwardt, F., Robinson, L., Trauner, D., Teixeira, H., Nogueira, A.J., Lillebø, A.I., Piet, G., Kuemmerlen, M., O’Higgins, T., McDonald, H., Arevalo-Torres, J., Barbosa, A., Iglesias-Campos, A., Hein, T. and Culhane F. (2019) ‘Exploring variability in environmental impact risk from human activities across aquatic ecosystems’, Science of the Total Environment, 652, pp. 1396-1408. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.339
Brion, N., Jans, S., Chou, L., and Rousseau, V. (2006) ‘Nutrient loads to the Belgian Coastal Zone’, in V. Rousseau, C. Lancelot, and D. Cox (eds) Current status of eutrophication in the Belgian coastal zone. Brussels, Belgium: Presses Université de Bruxelles, pp. 17–43.
Caldeira, K. and Wickett, M. (2003) ‘Anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH’, Nature, 425(365). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/425365a
Chahouri, A., Elouahmani, N., and Ouchene, H. (2022) ‘Recent progress in marine noise pollution: A thorough review’, Chemosphere, 291. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132983
Chen, F., Shapiro, G. I., Bennett, K. A., Ingram, S. N., Thompson, D., Vincent, C., Russell, D. and Embling, C. B. (2017) ‘Shipping noise in a dynamic sea: a case study of grey seals in the Celtic Sea’, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 114(1), pp. 372-383. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.09.054
Dailianis, T., Smith, C.J., Papadopoulou, N., Gerovasileiou, V., Sevastou, K., Bekkby, T., Bilan, M., Billett, D., Boström, C., Carreiro-Silva, M., Danovaro, R., Fraschetti, S., Gagnon, K., Gambi, C., Grehan, A., Kipson, S., Kotta, J., McOwen, C.J., Morato, T., Ojaveer, H., Pham, C.K. and Scrimgeour R. (2018) ‘Human activities and resultant pressures on key European marine habitats: an analysis of mapped resources’, Marine Policy, 98, pp. 1-10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.08.038
de Castro, M., Fileman, T and Hall-Spencer, J. (2017) ‘Invasive species in the Northeastern and Southwestern Atlantic Ocean: A review’, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 116 (1–2), pp. 41-47, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.12.048
de Jong, K., Amorim, M., Fonseca, P., Fox, C. and Heubel, K. (2018) ‘Noise can affect acoustic communication and subsequent spawning success in fish’, Environmental Pollution, 237, pp. 814-823. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.003
de Jong, K., Forland, T., Amorim, M., Rieucau, G., Slabbekoorn, H. and Doksæter Sivle, L. (2020) ‘Predicting the effects of anthropogenic noise on fish reproduction’, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 30, pp. 245–268. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-020-09598-9
Dulvy, N.K., Rogers, S.I., Jennings, S., Stelzenmüller, V., Dye, S.R. and Skjoldal H.R. (2008) ‘Climate change and deepening of the North Sea fish assemblage: a biotic indicator of warming seas’, Journal of Applied Ecology, 45(4), pp. 1029-1039. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01488.x
Edgar, G. J. (2011) ‘Does the global network of marine protected areas provide an adequate safety net for marine biodiversity?’ Aquatic conservation: marine and freshwater ecosystems, 21(4), pp. 313-316. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.1187
Edgar, G. J., Stuart-Smith, R. D., Willis, T. J., Kininmonth, S., Baker, S. C., Banks, S., Barrett, N. S., Becerro, M. A., Bernard, A. T., Berkhout, J., Buxton, C. D., Campbell, S. J., Cooper, A. T., Davey, M., Edgar, S. C., Försterra, G., Galván, D. E., Irigoyen, A. J., Kushner, D. J., Moura, R., Parnell, P.E., Shears, N.T., Soler, G., Strain, E. and Thomson, R. J. (2014) ‘Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features’, Nature, 506, pp. 216–220. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13022
Eldridge, P. and Roelke, D. (2011) ‘Hypoxia in Waters of the Coastal Zone: Causes, Effects, and Modeling Approaches’, Treatise on Estuarine and Coastal Science: Estuarine and Coastal Ecosystem Modelling, 9, pp. 193-215. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285287192_Hypoxia_in_Waters_of_the_Coastal_Zone_Causes_Effects_and_Modeling_Approaches (Accessed: 26 February 2023).
Emeis, K.C., van Beusekom, J., Callies, U., Ebinghaus, R., Kannen, A., Kraus, G., Kröncke, I., Lenhart, .H., Lorkowski, I., Matthias, V., Möllmann, C., Pätsch, J., Scharfe, M., Thomas, H., Weisse, R. and Zorita, E. (2015) ‘The North Sea — A shelf sea in the Anthropocene’, Journal of Marine Systems, 141 pp. 18-33. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.03.012
Fauchald, P., Skov, H., Skern-Mauritzen, M., Johns, D., and Tveraa, T. (2011) ‘Wasp-waist interactions in the north sea ecosystem’, PLoS One, 6(7). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022729
Gilbert, A. J., McQuatters-Gollop, A., Langmead, O., Mee, L., and Vermaat, J. (2015) ‘Visions for the North Sea: the societal dilemma behind specifying good environmental status’, Ambio, 44, pp. 142-153. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0536-5
Guinotte, J. and Fabry, V. (2008) ‘Ocean acidification and its potential effects on marine ecosystems’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1134(1), pp. 320-342. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1439.013
Heymans, J., Bundy, A., Christensen, V., Coll, M., De Mutsert, K., Fulton, E., Piroddi, C., Shin, Y-J., Steenbeek, J. and Travers-Trolet, M. (2020) ‘The Ocean Decade: A True Ecosystem Modeling Challenge’, Frontiers in Marine Science, 7. Available at: https://doi.10.3389/fmars.2020.554573
IPBES (2019) Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673
Kok, A., Bruil, L., Berges, B., Sakinan, S., Debusschere, E., Reubens, J., de Haan, D., Norro, A. and Slabbekoorn, H. (2021) ‘An echosounder view on the potential effects of impulsive noise pollution on pelagic fish around windfarms in the North Sea’, Environmental Pollution, 290. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118063
Ledoux, L. and Turner, R. (2002) ‘Valuing ocean and coastal resources: a review of practical examples and issues for further action’, Ocean & Coastal Management, 45(9-10), pp. 583-616. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-5691(02)00088-1
Leslie, H., Brandsma, S., van Velzen, M. and Vethaak, A. (2017) ‘Microplastics en route: field measurements in the Dutch river delta and Amsterdam canals, wastewater treatment plants, North Sea sediments and biota’, Environment International, 101, pp. 133-142. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.01.018
Lester, S. E., Halpern, B. S., Grorud-Colvert, K., Lubchenco, J., Ruttenberg, B. I., Gaines, S. D., Airamé, S. and Warner, R. R. (2009) ‘Biological effects within no-take marine reserves: a global synthesis’, Marine Ecology Progress Series, 384, pp. 33-46. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08029
Lotze, H.K., Coll, M. and Dunne, J.A. (2011) ‘Historical changes in marine resources, food-web structure and ecosystem functioning in the Adriatic Sea, Mediterranean’, Ecosystems 14(2), pp. 198–222. Available at: https//doi.org/10.1007/s10021-010-9404-8
Markus, T., and Sánchez, P. (2018) ‘Managing and regulating underwater noise pollution’, Handbook on marine environment protection: Science, impacts and sustainable management, pp. 971-995. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60156-4_52
Mazor, T., Doropoulos, C., Schwarzmueller, F., Gladish, D. W., Kumaran, N., Merkel, K., Di Marco, M. and Gagic, V. (2018) ‘Global mismatch of policy and research on drivers of biodiversity loss’, Nature ecology & evolution, 2(7), pp. 1071-1074. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0563-x
Middel, H. and Verones, F. (2017) ‘Making Marine Noise Pollution Impacts Heard: The Case of Cetaceans in the North Sea within Life Cycle Impact Assessment’, Sustainability, 9(7). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071138
OSPAR_Commission (2017) Third Integrated Report on the Eutrophication Status of the OSPAR Maritime Area. Available at: https://ap.lc/750Vw (Accessed: 27 February 2023).
Palma, J., Magalhães, M., Correia, M., and Andrade, J. (2019) ‘Effects of anthropogenic noise as a source of acoustic stress in wild populations of Hippocampus guttulatus in the Ria Formosa, south Portugal’, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 29(5), pp. 751-759. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3056
Radford, Z., Hyder, K., Zarauz, L., Mugerza, E., Ferter, K., Prellezo, R., Strehlow, H., Townhill, B., Lewin, W-C. and Weltersbach, M. (2018) ‘The impact of marine recreational fishing on key fish stocks in European waters’, PLoS ONE, 13(9). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201666
Reid, P. and Edwards, M. (2001) ‘Long-term changes in the pelagos, benthos and fisheries of the North Sea’, Senckenbergiana maritima, 31, pp. 107–115. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03043021
Ruiz, G., Carlton, J., Grosholz, E. and Hines, A. (1997) ‘Global Invasions of Marine and Estuarine Habitats by Non-Indigenous Species: Mechanisms, Extent, and Consequences’, American Zoologist, 37(6), pp. 621–632. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/37.6.621
Skirtun, M., Sandra, M., Strietman, W., van den Burg, S., De Raedemaecker, F. and Devriese, L. (2022) ‘Plastic pollution pathways from marine aquaculture practices and potential solutions for the North-East Atlantic region’, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 174. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.113178
Solberg, A., Rimereit B-E and Weinbach, J-E (2021) Leading Edge erosion and pollution from wind turbine blades, The Turbine Group. Available at: https://docs.wind-watch.org/Leading-Edge-erosion-and-pollution-from-wind-turbine-blades_5_july_English.pdf (Accessed: 1 March, 2023).
Stock, A., Haupt, A. J., Mach, M. E. and Micheli, F. (2018) ‘Mapping ecological indicators of human impact with statistical and machine learning methods: Tests on the California coast’, Ecological informatics, 48, pp. 37-47. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2018.07.007
Vilà, M. and Hulme P. (2018) Impact of Biological Invasions on Ecosystem Services, 12th edn. Berlin: Springer International Publishing.
Walsh, J., Carpenter, S. and Vander Zanden, M. (2016) ‘Invasive species triggers a massive loss of ecosystem services through a trophic cascade’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(15), pp. 4081-4085. Available at: https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1600366113
Wang, T., Zou, X., Li, B., Yao, Y., Li, J., Hui, H., and Wang, C. (2018) ‘Microplastics in a wind farm area: A case study at the Rudong Offshore Wind Farm, Yellow Sea, China’, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 128, pp. 466-474. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.01.050
Worm, B., Barbier, E.B., Beaumont, N., Duffy, J.E., Folke, C., Halpern, B.S., Jackson, J.B.C., Lotze, H.K., Micheli, F., Palumbi, S.R., Sala, E., Selkoe, K.A., Stachowicz, J.J. and Watson R. (2006) ‘Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services’, Science, 314(5800), pp. 787. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132294